Editorial guidelines

BlinkX aims to make AI video comparisons reproducible and understandable. These guidelines apply to model reviews, explainers, archive restorations and other editorial material.

Evidence before conclusions

We use equivalent prompts and settings where possible, preserve both successful and unsuccessful outputs, and distinguish measured facts from editorial judgment. A visually impressive sample is not treated as a complete benchmark.

Sources and attribution

We prefer primary sources for specifications, prices and policy claims. External reporting, images and videos are credited, linked and used only with an appropriate legal basis.

Restrictions and sensitive tests

Tests of model restrictions use lawful material involving adults. We describe refusals and modifications without trying to turn the main BlinkX site into an adult-content destination. Explicit model coverage belongs on a separately operated, age-appropriate service.

Corrections and updates

Material corrections are noted on the article. Publication and update dates remain visible, and an updated article does not silently rewrite the record of a prior test.

Commercial independence

Sponsorships, affiliate relationships, free credits and other material relationships are disclosed close to the relevant content. Commercial support does not purchase a score or editorial conclusion.